Technology as Terrorism: Police Control Technologies and Drone Warfare

Author:

Wolfendale Jessica

Abstract

AbstractDebates about terrorism and technology often focus on the potential uses of technology by non-state terrorist actors and by states as forms of counterterrorism. Yet, little has been written about how technology shapes how we think about terrorism. In this Chapter I argue that technology, and the language we use to talk about technology, constrains and shapes our moral understanding of the nature, scope, and impact of terrorism, particularly in relation to state terrorism. After exploring the ways in which technology shapes moral thinking, I use two case studies to demonstrate how technology simultaneously hides and enables terrorist forms of state violence: police control technologies and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones. In both these cases, I argue that features of these technologies, combined with a narrative of precision and efficiency, masks the terrorist nature of the violence that these practices inflict and reinforces the moral exclusion of those against whom these technologies are deployed. In conclusion, I propose that identifying acts of terrorism requires a focus on the impact of technologies of violence (whether they are “high tech” or not) on those most affected, regardless of whether users of these technologies conceive of their actions as terrorist.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference60 articles.

1. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

2. Amoore L (2009) Algorithmic war: everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode 41(1):49–69

3. Atherton KD (2020) Trump inherited the drone war but ditched accountability: only a single formal check remains on U.S. killings worldwide. Foreign Policy, 22 May 2020. Available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/22/obama-drones-trump-killings-count/

4. Bacchini F, Lorusso L (2019) Race, again: how face recognition technology reinforces racial discrimination. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 17(3):321–335

5. Benjamin R (2019) Race after technology. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. C-UAS in the Protection of Critical Infrastructures;Management and Industrial Engineering;2024

2. Drone Warfare, Civilian Deaths, and the Narrative of Honest Mistakes;Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case;2023-10-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3