Abstract
AbstractDebates about terrorism and technology often focus on the potential uses of technology by non-state terrorist actors and by states as forms of counterterrorism. Yet, little has been written about how technology shapes how we think about terrorism. In this Chapter I argue that technology, and the language we use to talk about technology, constrains and shapes our moral understanding of the nature, scope, and impact of terrorism, particularly in relation to state terrorism. After exploring the ways in which technology shapes moral thinking, I use two case studies to demonstrate how technology simultaneously hides and enables terrorist forms of state violence: police control technologies and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones. In both these cases, I argue that features of these technologies, combined with a narrative of precision and efficiency, masks the terrorist nature of the violence that these practices inflict and reinforces the moral exclusion of those against whom these technologies are deployed. In conclusion, I propose that identifying acts of terrorism requires a focus on the impact of technologies of violence (whether they are “high tech” or not) on those most affected, regardless of whether users of these technologies conceive of their actions as terrorist.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference60 articles.
1. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Amoore L (2009) Algorithmic war: everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode 41(1):49–69
3. Atherton KD (2020) Trump inherited the drone war but ditched accountability: only a single formal check remains on U.S. killings worldwide. Foreign Policy, 22 May 2020. Available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/22/obama-drones-trump-killings-count/
4. Bacchini F, Lorusso L (2019) Race, again: how face recognition technology reinforces racial discrimination. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 17(3):321–335
5. Benjamin R (2019) Race after technology. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. C-UAS in the Protection of Critical Infrastructures;Management and Industrial Engineering;2024
2. Drone Warfare, Civilian Deaths, and the Narrative of Honest Mistakes;Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case;2023-10-04