Stakeholders in Research and Innovation: Towards Responsible Governance

Author:

Braun Robert,Starkbaum JohannesORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) revolves around stakeholders of research and innovation aiming for societal desirability of the innovation process. In practice, it is often not clear, however, why one instead of another stakeholder-(group) is invited and for which purpose (Repo and Matschoss 2019). In most of the RRI discourse, ‘stakeholders’ are used as a catchall phrase denoting societal actors without actually pointing to who they are, why their participation is important, what exactly they contribute and why they should be involved in the R & I processes. In the case of citizen engagement, a typical bias emerges around the inclusion of easily accessible groups of publics. In this chapter we look at stakeholder theory as it has been developed and used for strategic business purposes from the mid 80’s and suggest how stakeholder theory may be combined with RRI, RI and QH approaches and applied to research and innovation. We argue that moral, epistemic and power diversity and balance is key to a stakeholder theory of RRI in order to facilitate a democratic debate amongst a wide group of stakeholders in a specific R & I endeavor in order to arrive at outcomes that are appropriate, legitimate, and desirable.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference61 articles.

1. Argyris, Chris, and Donald A. Schön. 1989. Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. American Behavioral Scientist 32 (5): 612–623.

2. Arnkil, Robert, Anu Järvensivu, Pasi Koski, and Tatu Piirainen. 2010. Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models. Työraportteja working paper by the University of Tampere 85/2010:https://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf?sequence=1.

3. Bajmócy, Zoltán, and György Pataki. 2019. Responsible research and innovation and the challenge of co-creation. In Yearbook 2018 of the institute for advanced studies on science, technology and society, ed. Arno Bammé and Günter Getzinge, 1–15. Wien and Munich: Profil Verlag.

4. Bauer, Anja, Alexander Bogner, Daniela Fuchs, Hannah Kosow, and Marion Dreyer. 2016. Societal engagement under the terms of RRI. PROSO Deliverable D2 (2): 1–66. http://www.proso-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/proso_d2.2_societal_engagement.pdf.

5. Bird, Alexander, and James Ladyman. 2012. Arguing about science: Routledge.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3