When in Memeland, Speak in Memes: Contributions of Design Towards the Betterment of Online Behavior Regarding Public Health-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

When in Memeland, Speak in Memes: Contributions of Design Towards the Betterment of Online Behavior Regarding Public Health

Published:2023-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:470-486
ISSN:2661-8184
Container-title:Springer Series in Design and Innovation
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Alvelos Heitor^ORCID,Pereira Jorge Brandão^ORCID,Chatterjee Abhishek^ORCID,Barreto Susana^ORCID,da Veiga Pedro Alves^ORCID,Lima Cláudia Raquel^ORCID,Penedos-Santiago Eliana^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-47281-7_39

Reference50 articles.

1. Arif N, et al (2018) Fake news or weak science? Visibility and characterization of antivaccine webpages returned by google in different languages and countries. Front. Immunol 9: art. 1215, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01215

2. Ballantyne N, Dunning D (2022) Skeptics say, ‘do your own research.’ it’s not that simple. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html. Accessed 31 May 2023

3. Benoit SL, Mauldin RF (2021) The “anti-vax” movement: a quantitative report on vaccine beliefs and knowledge across social media. BMC Public Health 21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8

4. Bessi A, Zollo F, del Vicario M, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Quattrociocchi W (2015) Trend of narratives in the age of misinformation. Plos ONE 10(8):e0134641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134641

5. Betsch C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T, Ulshöfer C (2010) The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. J Health Psychol 15(3):446–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309353647