Writing Processes in the Digital Age: A Networked Interpretation

Author:

Cummings LanceORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of writing processes is clearly useful for the study of digital writing when we see writing as a complex, integrated set of actions that are organized in time and integrated into both digital and physical spaces. With the increased digitalization of writing, the processes of writing are becoming more integrated into a variety of tools, workspaces, and platforms, adding new layers to how we perform writing. This chapter explores how writers and researchers can conceptualize digital writing activities as new platforms and software continue to evolve, changing the way writers adapt processes to complex writing situations. The proliferation of digital spaces and tools also raises the visibility of writing processes formerly difficult to assess and evaluate due to their cognitive nature. This chapter will summarize primary approaches to writing processes and several heuristics currently used to understand and analyze writing as a dynamic and networked activity. These tools are useful for examining the new ways digital technologies make writing processes visible for both research and reflection. The chapter will also discuss some implications for theory, pedagogy, and research.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference38 articles.

1. Anson, C. (2000). Talking about writing: A classroom-based study of students’ reflections on their drafts. Smith and Yancey, 59–74.

2. Anson, C. (2014). Process pedagogy and its legacy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper Taggart, K. Schick, & H. Brooke Hessler (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 212–230). Oxford University Press.

3. Bernhardt, S. A. (2013). Rhetorical technologies, technological rhetorics. College Composition and Communication, 64(4), 704–720. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/rhetorical-technologies-technological-rhetorics/docview/1369719632/se-2

4. Boyle, C. (2016). Writing and rhetoric and/as posthuman practice. College English, 78(6), 532–554.

5. Bradley, L. (2014). Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment—Student interaction and reflections. Computers and Composition, 34, 80–95.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3