Developing the Questionnaire-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Developing the Questionnaire

Published:2020-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:7-36
ISSN:2191-5504
Container-title:Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mariel Petr^ORCID,Hoyos David^ORCID,Meyerhoff Jürgen^ORCID,Czajkowski Mikolaj^ORCID,Dekker Thijs^ORCID,Glenk Klaus^ORCID,Jacobsen Jette Bredahl^ORCID,Liebe Ulf^ORCID,Olsen Søren Bøye^ORCID,Sagebiel Julian^ORCID,Thiene Mara^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter outlines the essential topics for developing and testing a questionnaire for a discrete choice experiment survey. It addresses issues such as the description of the environmental good, pretesting of the survey, incentive compatibility, consequentiality or mitigation of hypothetical bias. For the latter, cheap talk scripts, opt-out reminders or an oath script are discussed. Moreover, the use of instructional choice sets, the identification of protest responses and strategic bidders are considered. Finally, issues related to the payment vehicle and the cost vector design are the subject of this section.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_2

Reference133 articles.

1. Aadland D, Caplan AJ (2003) Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias. Am J Agr Econ 85:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00136

2. Aadland D, Caplan AJ (2006) Cheap talk reconsidered: new evidence from CVM. J Econ Behav Organ 60:562–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.006

3. Aanesen M, Armstrong C, Czajkowski M et al (2015) Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: preserving cold-water coral in Norway. Ecol Econ 112:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.007

4. Abate TG, Mørkbak MR, Olsen SB (2018) Inducing value and institutional learning effects in stated choice experiments using advanced disclosure and instructional choice set treatments. Agric Econ 49:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12420

5. Alemu MH, Olsen SB (2018) Can a repeated opt-out reminder mitigate hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. Eur Rev Agric Econ 45:749–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jby009

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The value of improving freshwater ecosystem services: South Carolina residents’ willingness to pay for improved water quality;Journal of Environmental Management;2024-02

2. Local Communities’ and Parishioners’ Perceptions on Monasteries’ Forest Patch Plant Biodiversity Conservation in Northern Wollo Ethiopia;International Journal of Forestry Research;2023-01-30

3. The willingness to pay for seismic retrofitted buildings: A discrete choice experiment;International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction;2022-03