Author:
Forsberg Eva,Geschwind Lars,Levander Sara,Wermke Wieland
Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter, we outline the notion of peer review and its relation to the autonomy of the academic profession and the contract between science and society. This is followed by an introduction of some key themes regarding the practices of peer review. Next, we specify some reasons to further explore different practices of peer review. Briefly, the state of the art is presented. Finally, the structure of this volume and its individual contributions are presented.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference74 articles.
1. Aagaard, K., Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2015). Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 106–117.
2. Ballou, K. A. (1998). A concept analysis of autonomy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 14(2), 102–110.
3. Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113(1), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education.
5. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Open University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献