Author:
Jennissen Roel,Bovens Mark,Engbersen Godfried,Bokhorst Meike
Abstract
AbstractThe increasing diversity of the Dutch population is making conviviality more complicated. Not only in the big cities and their suburbs, but also in medium-sized cities, expat and horticultural municipalities (see Chap. 3). Moreover, modern migrants do not stay in the Netherlands as long as they used to; half have left again after 5 years. This places considerable demands upon schools, for example, which have to deal with pupils arriving and leaving throughout the course of the year. For voluntary associations, too, a high turnover of members is not conducive to cohesion. And the same applies to neighbourhoods where much of the population is just ‘passing through’.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference126 articles.
1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2. Apfelbaum, E. P., Stephens, N. M., & Reagans, R. E. (2016). Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 547–566.
3. Baysu, G., Celeste, L., Brown, R., Verschueren, K., & Phalet, K. (2016). Minority adolescents in ethnically diverse schools: Perceptions of equal treatment buffer threat effects. Child Development, 87(5), 1352–1366.
4. Bekhuis, H., Ruiter, S., & Coenders, M. (2013). Xenophobia among youngsters: The effect of inter-ethnic contact. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 229–242.
5. Beuzenberg, V., Corel, A., & Lustenhouwer, F. (2017). Lokale effecten van de Woningwet, Quickscan. Platform 31.