1. S. Samadi, M.-C. Gröne, U. Schneidewind, H.-J. Luhmann, J. Venjakob, and B. Best, ‘Sufficiency in energy scenario studies: Taking the potential benefits of lifestyle changes into account’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 124, pp. 126–134, Nov. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.013.
2. K. Glinos, ‘Open Science’, European Union, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/knowledge_publications_tools_and_data/documents/ec_rtd_factsheet-open-science_2019.pdf
3. UNESCO, ‘Joint Appeal for Open Science’, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) - World Health Organisation (WHO) - United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Oct. 2020. Accessed: Jan. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/joint_appeal_for_open_sciences_fin_en_fin_0.pdf
4. S. Pfenninger et al., ‘Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned’, Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 19, pp. 63–71, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002.
5. Open Knowledge Foundation, ‘Open Definition 2.1 - Open Definition - Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge’, 2015. https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/ (accessed Jan. 04, 2021).