Abstract
AbstractMeasurement choices play a critical role in improving healthcare systems. As this book describes, improved measurement can promote excellence in person-centered outcomes through health policy, methodology, theory, and clinical practice. This chapter focuses on measurement choices within clinical practice that can guide decision-making for improved outcomes. The overall objective is for clinical practice to deliver high-quality and equitable healthcare tailored to the unique situation of each specific person. Separate sections discuss the context surrounding measurement choices, specific dilemmas or competing priorities that affect measurement choices, and recommendations for improving person-centered outcome measurement.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference168 articles.
1. 2019-07 | CMS. (n.d.). Retrieved January 9, 2021, from https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/MLN-Publications-Items/CMS1243364
2. M. Abdul-Kareem. Here’s why we should care more about equity, not equality (2018, January 5). Retrieved January 9, 2022, from https://muslimgirl.com/heres-care-equity-equality/
3. A. Alismail, B. Schaeffer, A. Oh, S. Hamiduzzaman, N. Daher, H.Y. Song, et al., The use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an outpatient allergy and pulmonary clinic: an innovative look into using tablet-based tool vs traditional survey method. Patient Relat. Outcome Meas. 11, 137–142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431
4. D.D. Allen, Proposing 6 dimensions within the construct of movement in the Movement Continuum Theory. Phys. Ther. 87, 888–898 (2007a)
5. D.D. Allen, Responsiveness of the movement ability measure: A self-report instrument proposed for assessing the effectiveness of physical therapy intervention. Phys. Ther. 87, 917–924 (2007b)