New Approaches to Patient Work and Occupation

Author:

Freebody Jane

Abstract

AbstractFreebody demonstrates how new theories regarding the therapeutic use of occupation, developed during the early twentieth century in Germany and the USA, were received very differently by French and English psychiatrists, highlighting the disparity in their respective interpretations of mental disorder. In England, where psychiatrists had come to regard mental disorder holistically after World War I, the new approaches were adopted as curative treatments. French psychiatrists, the majority of whom maintained their belief in the physiological nature of mental disorder, largely ignored the new theories. In England, occupational therapy (either in the form of arts and crafts or of carefully allocated and supervised work around the hospital) became the hallmark of a modern hospital. In France, patient work remained much as it had done before World War I, with the exception of the Henri Rousselle Hospital in Paris.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference59 articles.

1. Andrews, Jonathan, Asa Briggs, Roy Porter, Penny Tucker, and Keir Waddington. The History of Bethlem. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 1997.

2. Ankele, Monika. “The Patient’s View of Work Therapy: The Mental Hospital Hamburg-Langenhorn during the Weimar Republic.” In Work, Psychiatry and Society, c.1750–2015, edited by Waltraud Ernst, 238–61. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.

3. Blakesley, Rosalind. The Arts and Crafts Movement. London and New York: Phaidon, 2006.

4. Casson, Elizabeth. “Forward.” In The Story of Dorset House School of Occupational Therapy, 1930–1986, edited by Betty Collins, 3–6. Oxford: unpublished, 1986.

5. Coffin, Jean-Christophe. “‘Misery and Revolution’: The Organisation of French Psychiatry, 1900–1980.” In Psychiatric Cultures Compared: Psychiatry and Mental Health Care in the Twentieth Century: Comparisons and Approaches, edited by Marijke Gijswijt-Hofstra, Harry Oosterhuis, Joost Vijselaar and Hugh Freeman, 225–48. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2005.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3