Author:
Moro Abadía Oscar,Conkey Margaret W.,McDonald Josephine
Abstract
AbstractIn this collection of papers on globalization and rock art, we begin to examine how rock art research was historically shaped by a deep Eurocentric bias. We use the concept of deep time, following the recent focus of historians and other disciplines, where an appropriate scale of space and time is being explored to understand the human past (following McGrath and Jebb, Long history, deep time. Deepening histories of place. ANU Press, Canberra. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_578874, 2015; Griffiths, Deep time dreaming: uncovering ancient Australia. Black Inc., Carlton, 2018). A focus on the “deep time story”, as Billy (Griffiths, Deep time dreaming: uncovering ancient Australia. Black Inc., Carlton, p. 5, 2018) asserts, reminds us that history is but one way of thinking about the relationships between past and present. Rock art research has multiple lenses, rather than being a universal science or all-knowing truth. Deeply engrained Eurocentric biases that drove the earliest research efforts into deep time art and its makers, has shifted to a more global perspective on rock art and the people who made it, by those who are involved in its research, and by those for whom it has multiple significances. The proliferation of rock art research in colonized parts of the world, particularly the USA, Australia and Africa, continues to call into question this Eurocentrism. This shift in focus has been fueled, in part, by globalization, which has resulted in many benefits for rock art researchers, including the expansion of inquiry into new territories and the rapid sharing of developments in new methods for surveying, recording and dating rock images. Globalization has also generated new challenges and tensions. There are still many countries and territories that are excluded from these discussions, and Western hegemony and patrimony as promoted by institutions such as UNESCO, often collide with the interests of nationalism and local communities. The chapters in this volume explore these tensions and many suggest strategies to promote more critical attitudes toward globalization.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference142 articles.
1. Angas, George French. 1847. Savage life and scenes in Australia and New Zealand: being an artist’s impressions of countries and people at the antipodes. Vol. 1. London: Smith, Elder, and Co., 65, Cornhill.
2. Aschero, Carlos A. 2018. Hunting scenes in Cueva de las Manos. Styles, content and chronology (Rio Pinturas, Santa Cruz, Argentinian Patagonia). In Archaeologies of rock art. South American perspectives, ed. Andrés Troncoso, Felipe Amstrong, and George Nash, 209–237. London: Routledge.
3. Aschero, Carlos A., and Patricia Schneier. 2021. The ‘Black Series’ in the hunting scenes of Cueva De Las Manos, Río Pinturas, Patagonia, Argentina. In Making Scenes: Global Perspectives on Scenes in Rock Art, ed. Iain Davidson and April Nowell, 310–326. New York: Berghahn.
4. Ashcroff, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 1998. Key concepts in post- Colonial studies. London: Routledge.
5. Askew, Marc. 2010. The magic list of global status: UNESCO, World Heritage and the agendas of states. In Heritage and globalisation, ed. Sophia Labadi and Colin Long, 19–44. London: Routledge.