Compositionality in Different Modalities: A View from Usage-Based Linguistics

Author:

Pleyer Michael,Lepic Ryan,Hartmann StefanORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe field of linguistics concerns itself with understanding the human capacity for language. Compositionality is a key notion in this research tradition. Compositionality refers to the notion that the meaning of a complex linguistic unit is a function of the meanings of its constituent parts. However, the question as to whether compositionality is a defining feature of human language is a matter of debate: usage-based and constructionist approaches emphasize the pervasive role of idiomaticity in language, and argue that strict compositionality is the exception rather than the rule. We review the major discussion points on compositionality from a usage-based point of view, taking both spoken and signed languages into account. In addition, we discuss theories that aim at accounting for the emergence of compositional language through processes of cultural transmission as well as the debate of whether animal communication systems exhibit compositionality. We argue for a view that emphasizes the analyzability of complex linguistic units, providing a template for accounting for the multimodal nature of human language.

Funder

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference171 articles.

1. Adams, F., & Beighly, S. M. (2013). Information, meaning and animal communication. In U. E. Stegmann (Ed.), Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence (pp. 399–420). Cambridge University Press.

2. Arbib, M. A. (2012). Compositionality and beyond: Embodied meaning in language and protolanguage. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality (pp. 475–492). Oxford University Press.

3. Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K. (2006). Language evolution: semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature, 441(7091), 303.

4. Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2005). Morphological universals and the sign language type. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, 19–39.

5. Battison, R. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Linstok Press.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3