Abstract
AbstractThe innovation systems (IS) approach—developed by Richard Nelson, Christopher Freeman and Bengt-Ake Lundvall, amongst others—has become perhaps the dominant approach in the academic literature for the study of innovation. It has also exerted considerable influence on policy. This paper examines both the theory underpinning the IS approach, which bears considerable affinities with Austrian economics, and also its policy implications. It is argued that the work of Friedrich Hayek and Elinor Ostrom in particular can be used to draw attention to some potential difficulties with the way in which the IS approach is often used to guide policy. Ideas drawn from Austrian economics, as well as the work of Elinor Ostrom, are used to help develop and improve the IS approach, both theoretically and in terms of its approach to policy.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference90 articles.
1. Aligica, P. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aligica, P. (2019). Public entrepreneurship, citizenship, and self-governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Amendona, M., & Vona, F. (2012). Coordinating the accumulation of physical and human Capital in Different Institutional Settings. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, 631–653.
4. Antoneli, C. (2017). Endogenous innovation: The creative response. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26, 689–718.
5. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献