The innovation systems approach: an Austrian and Ostromian perspective

Author:

Lewis Paul

Abstract

AbstractThe innovation systems (IS) approach—developed by Richard Nelson, Christopher Freeman and Bengt-Ake Lundvall, amongst others—has become perhaps the dominant approach in the academic literature for the study of innovation. It has also exerted considerable influence on policy. This paper examines both the theory underpinning the IS approach, which bears considerable affinities with Austrian economics, and also its policy implications. It is argued that the work of Friedrich Hayek and Elinor Ostrom in particular can be used to draw attention to some potential difficulties with the way in which the IS approach is often used to guide policy. Ideas drawn from Austrian economics, as well as the work of Elinor Ostrom, are used to help develop and improve the IS approach, both theoretically and in terms of its approach to policy.

Funder

John Templeton Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference90 articles.

1. Aligica, P. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Aligica, P. (2019). Public entrepreneurship, citizenship, and self-governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Amendona, M., & Vona, F. (2012). Coordinating the accumulation of physical and human Capital in Different Institutional Settings. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, 631–653.

4. Antoneli, C. (2017). Endogenous innovation: The creative response. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26, 689–718.

5. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3