Comments on the Letter to the Editor on “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes” by Jaime A. Teixera da Silva and Judit Dobránszki-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comments on the Letter to the Editor on “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes” by Jaime A. Teixera da Silva and Judit Dobránszki

Published:2018-03-07 Issue:2 Volume:115 Page:1115-1117
ISSN:0138-9130
Container-title:Scientometrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Scientometrics

Author:

Bar-Ilan Judit

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2681-2/fulltext.html

Reference6 articles.

1. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—A comparison of WoS. Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

2. Elsevier. (2017). Scopus content coverage guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/0597-Scopus-Content-Coverage-Guide-US-LETTER-v4-HI-singles-no-ticks.pdf . Accessed 28 Dec 2017.

3. Ruiz-Pérez, R., Delgado-Lopez-Cózar, E., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2003). Spanish name indexing errors in international databases. The Lancet, 361(9369), 1656–1657.

4. Ruiz-Pérez, R., López-Cózar, E. D., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2002). Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: Implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(4), 411–430.

5. Teixera da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2018). Multiple versions of the h-index: Cautionary use for formal academic purposes. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2680-3 .

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?;Scientometrics;2020-09-14

2. Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science;Scientometrics;2020-04-04

3. Rejoinder to “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes”;Scientometrics;2018-03-07