Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations
-
Published:2024-01-08
Issue:2
Volume:129
Page:825-845
-
ISSN:0138-9130
-
Container-title:Scientometrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Scientometrics
Author:
Huang Chun-KaiORCID, Neylon CameronORCID, Montgomery LucyORCID, Hosking RichardORCID, Diprose James P.ORCID, Handcock Rebecca N.ORCID, Wilson KatieORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe goal of open access is to allow more people to read and use research outputs. An observed association between highly cited research outputs and open access has been claimed as evidence of increased usage of the research, but this remains controversial. A higher citation count also does not necessarily imply wider usage such as citations by authors from more places. A knowledge gap exists in our understanding of who gets to use open access research outputs and where users are located. Here we address this gap by examining the association between an output’s open access status and the diversity of research outputs that cite it. By analysing large-scale bibliographic data from 2010 to 2019, we found a robust association between open access and increased diversity of citation sources by institutions, countries, subregions, regions, and fields of research, across outputs with both high and medium–low citation counts. Open access through disciplinary or institutional repositories showed a stronger effect than open access via publisher platforms. This study adds a new perspective to our understanding of how citations can be used to explore the effects of open access. It also provides new evidence at global scale of the benefits of open access as a mechanism for widening the use of research and increasing the diversity of the communities that benefit from it.
Funder
Curtin University Research Office Curtin University Faculty of Humanities Curtin University School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry Arcadia a Charitable Fund of Lisbet Rausing & Peter Baldwin Curtin University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world level—1996–2013. RTD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access. Report. Science-Metrix. Retrieved August 19, 2022, from https://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf 2. Basson, I., Blanckenberg, J. P., & Prozesky, H. (2021). Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas. Scientometrics, 126, 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9 3. Bautista-Puig, N., Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moed, H. F. (2020). Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage? Scientometrics, 124, 2551–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03546-x 4. Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., La Manna, M., Rév, I., Segbert, M., de Souza, S., Suber P., Velterop, J. (2002). Read the declaration—Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/ 5. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2018). Making citations of publications in languages other than English visible: on the feasibility of a PLOTE-index. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy010
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|