Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations

Author:

Huang Chun-KaiORCID,Neylon CameronORCID,Montgomery LucyORCID,Hosking RichardORCID,Diprose James P.ORCID,Handcock Rebecca N.ORCID,Wilson KatieORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe goal of open access is to allow more people to read and use research outputs. An observed association between highly cited research outputs and open access has been claimed as evidence of increased usage of the research, but this remains controversial. A higher citation count also does not necessarily imply wider usage such as citations by authors from more places. A knowledge gap exists in our understanding of who gets to use open access research outputs and where users are located. Here we address this gap by examining the association between an output’s open access status and the diversity of research outputs that cite it. By analysing large-scale bibliographic data from 2010 to 2019, we found a robust association between open access and increased diversity of citation sources by institutions, countries, subregions, regions, and fields of research, across outputs with both high and medium–low citation counts. Open access through disciplinary or institutional repositories showed a stronger effect than open access via publisher platforms. This study adds a new perspective to our understanding of how citations can be used to explore the effects of open access. It also provides new evidence at global scale of the benefits of open access as a mechanism for widening the use of research and increasing the diversity of the communities that benefit from it.

Funder

Curtin University Research Office

Curtin University Faculty of Humanities

Curtin University School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry

Arcadia a Charitable Fund of Lisbet Rausing & Peter Baldwin

Curtin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world level—1996–2013. RTD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access. Report. Science-Metrix. Retrieved August 19, 2022, from https://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf

2. Basson, I., Blanckenberg, J. P., & Prozesky, H. (2021). Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas. Scientometrics, 126, 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9

3. Bautista-Puig, N., Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moed, H. F. (2020). Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage? Scientometrics, 124, 2551–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03546-x

4. Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., La Manna, M., Rév, I., Segbert, M., de Souza, S., Suber P., Velterop, J. (2002). Read the declaration—Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/

5. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2018). Making citations of publications in languages other than English visible: on the feasibility of a PLOTE-index. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy010

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3