Abstract
AbstractScholars in science and technology studies and bibliometricians are increasingly revealing the performative nature of bibliometric indicators. Far from being neutral technical measures, indicators such as the Impact Factor and the h-index are deeply transforming the social and epistemic structures of contemporary science. At the same time, scholars have highlighted how bibliometric indicators are endowed with social meanings that go beyond their purely technical definitions. These social representations of bibliometric indicators are constructed and negotiated between different groups of actors within several arenas. This study aims to investigate how bibliometric indicators are used in a context, which, so far, has not yet been covered by researchers, that of daily newspapers. By a content analysis of a corpus of 583 articles that appeared in four major Italian newspapers between 1990 and 2020, we chronicle the main functions that bibliometrics and bibliometric indicators played in the Italian press. Our material shows, among other things, that the public discourse developed in newspapers creates a favorable environment for bibliometrics-centered science policies, that bibliometric indicators contribute to the social construction of scientific facts in the press, especially in science news related to medicine, and that professional bibliometric expertise struggles to be represented in newspapers and hence reach the general public.
Funder
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. Aksnes, D. W., & Rip, A. (2009). Researchers’ perceptions of citations. Research Policy, 38(6), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.001
2. Alberts, B. (2013). Impact factor distortions. Science, 340(6134), 787–787. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240319
3. Ampollini, I., & Bucchi, M. (2020). When public discourse mirrors academic debate: Research integrity in the media. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00103-5
4. ANVUR. (2018). Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca—2018 [Biannual Report on the State of the University and Research System—2018]. Retrieved November 22, 2020, from https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ANVUR-Rapporto-2018.pdf.
5. Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G., & Petrovich, E. (2019). Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献