Powder bed fusion factory productivity increases using discrete event simulation and genetic algorithm

Author:

Al-zqebah Ruba,Guertler Matthias,Clemon Lee

Abstract

AbstractPowder bed fusion is importance is growing with uses across industries in both polymer and metallic components, particularly in mass individualization. However, due to the relatively slow mass deposition speed compared to conventional methods, scheduling and production planning play a crucial role in scaling up additive manufacturing productivity to higher volumes. This paper introduces a framework combining discrete event simulation and a genetic algorithm showing makespan improvement opportunities for multiple powder bed fusion factories varying workers, jobs and available equipment. The results show that bottlenecks move among workstations based on worker and capital equipment availability, which depend on the size of the facility indicating a resource-driven constraint for makespan. A makespan reduction of 78% is achieved in the simulation. This shows the trade-off of worker and capital equipment to achieve makespan improvements. The addition of personnel or equipment increases production with further gains achieved by scheduling optimization. Two levels of job demands are analyzed showing productivity gains of 45% makespan improvement when adding the first worker and additional savings with scheduling optimization using a genetic algorithm up to 11%. Most research on additive manufacturing production has focused on the quality of produced parts and printing technology rather than factory level management. This is the first application of this methodology to varying sizes of these potential factories. The method developed here will help decision-makers to determine the appropriate number of resources to meet their customer demand on time, additionally, finding the optimal route for jobs before starting the production process.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. ISO, ASTM (2021) Additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

2. Schäfer L, Klenk F, Maier T, Zehner M, Peukert S, Linzbach R, Treiber T, Lanza G (2024) A systematic approach for simulation-based dimensioning of production systems during the concept phase of factory planning. Prod Eng 1-13

3. Cai C, Tey WS, Chen J, Zhu W, Liu X, Liu T, Zhao L, Zhou K (2021) Comparative study on 3d printing of polyamide 12 by selective laser sintering and multi jet fusion. J Mater Process Technol 288:116882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116882

4. Fast Radius: MJF vs. FDM: what you need to know. (March 30, 2022). https://www.fastradius.com/resources/mjf-vs-fdm/. Accessed 10 Aug 2023

5. HP: HP multi jet fusion 3D printing technology for end of arm tooling. (November 8, 2021). https://www.roboticstomorrow.com/article/2021/07/hp-multi-jet-fusion-3d-printing-technology-for-end-of-arm-tooling/17230. Accessed 10 Aug 2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3