1. Abrahamsen, A., & Bechtel, W. (2006). Phenomena and mechanisms: Putting the symbolic, connectionist, and dynamical systems debate in broader perspective. In R. Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science (pp. 159–185). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2. Abrahamsen, A., & Bechtel, W. (2012). From reactive to endogenously active dynamical conceptions of the brain. In K. Plaisance & T. Reydon (Eds.), Philosophy of behavioral biology (pp. 329–366). Amsterdam: Springer.
3. Aminoff, E., Balslev, D., Borroni, P., Bryan, R., Chua, E., Cloutier, J., et al. (2009). The landscape of cognitive neuroscience: Challenges, rewards, and new perspectives. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV (pp. 1253–1260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bechtel, W. (1998). Representations and cognitive explanations: Assessing the dynamicist’s challenge in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 295–318.
5. Bechtel, W. (2001). The compatibility of complex systems and reduction. Minds and Machines, 11(4), 483–502.