Abstract
AbstractThe study aimed to assess the alterations in the morphology, elemental composition, and biocompatibility of infra-zygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews, before and after their insertion in the patient’s oral cavity. The study was conducted on 16 IZC miniscrews (8 as-received and 8 retrieved). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate the miniscrew surfaces. Micrographs were obtained at ×50, ×100, and ×500 magnification. The miniscrews were subjected to Energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis to investigate the elemental composition. It was performed at four zones of each miniscrew- head, neck, body, tip. Corrosion of the miniscrews was analyzed through the potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) test by immersing the stainless steel (SS) miniscrews in an artificial saliva medium (pH 5.8) and then allowing it to obtain a steady-state open-circuit potential (OCP) for 15 min. Gingival fibroblasts were cultured using gingival tissue which was used to check the biocompatibility of the miniscrews by observing their proliferation and viability by MTT colorimetric assay. The SEM analysis showed generalized surface dullness, variable corrosion, craters, and blunting in the retrieved miniscrews. EDX analyses showed the deposition of additional elements: carbon, oxygen, calcium, and nitrogen in the retrieved miniscrews. PDP tests showed a higher corrosion rate in the retrieved miniscrews, but the results were not significant. The MTT assay showed that the cell viability was higher in the as-received group and the results were statistically significant with apvalue of 0.002. It was concluded that the retrieved miniscrews exhibited morphologic surface changes in the form of dullness, blunting of threads and tips, corrosion, craters, and cracks which were not seen in the as-received miniscrews. A higher percentage of adsorbed elements were seen on the retrieved miniscrew surface. The corrosion rate assessed through the PDP test for both groups was comparable. The fibroblast cell viability was significantly reduced in the retrieved miniscrews when compared to as-received miniscrews.
Funder
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Metals and Alloys
Reference42 articles.
1. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Nanda R (2009) Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients. Angle Orthod 79(2):240–247
2. Knop LA, Soares AP, Shintcovsk RL, Martins LP, Gandini LG Jr (2015) Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants. Braz J Oral Sci 14:251–255
3. Gainsforth BL, Higley LB (1945) A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 31(8):406–417
4. Kanomi R (1997) Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J clin Orthod 31:763–767
5. Erverdi N, Keles A, Nanda R. The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation, vol 74, Angle Orthodontist. 2004.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Overview of Mini-screws in Orthodontics;Mechanisms and Machine Science;2024