Abstract
AbstractWhy did German physicists not build an atomic bomb during the Second World War? This question has long been controversial. This essay provides a new perspective through a focus on the everyday practice of the physicists in their laboratories. The study of everyday research work has long been obscured by the question of the bomb. To this end, the research of the Viennese group in the GermanUranverein, or “Uranium Club,” will be analyzed in detail. What breaks and continuities were there in everyday laboratory practice? Were the physicists able to acquire new resources? Did they at least come close to the scale of Big Science or did their research remain tied to the academic laboratory?
Funder
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,History
Reference84 articles.
1. For example, David Cassidy discussed the controversies between Samuel Goudsmit and Werner Heisenberg in 1991 and the dispute between Niels Bohr and Heisenberg led to Michael Frayn’s famous play Copenhagen: David C. Cassidy, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1991); Michael Frayn, Copenhagen (New York: Anchor Books, 2000).
2. See the discussion in Rainer Karlsch, Hitlers Bombe: Die Geheime Geschichte Der Deutschen Kernwaffenversuche (München: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt GmbH, 2005).
3. Manfred Popp, "Misinterpreted Documents and Ignored Physical Facts: The History of 'Hitler's Atomic Bomb' Needs to Be Corrected," Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 39, no. 3 (2016), 265-82
4. Mark Walker, "Physics, History, and the German Atomic Bomb," Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 40, no. 3 (2017), 271-88.
5. Mark Walker, German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power, 1939–1949 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献