Abstract
AbstractThe crisis resilience of vital social systems is currently the target of constant development efforts in Finland, as their drifting into crisis would weaken societies’ functional abilities, safety, and security. This is also the case regarding the Finnish health care system. In an attempt to move beyond existing frameworks of crisis imagination, this article takes an unconventional stance by elucidating endogenous crisis dynamics present in the Finnish health care system. Delphi process was conducted for top experts in Finnish health care and crisis management. With a dissensus-seeking orientation, our aim was to fertilize disagreements among panelists to reveal key vulnerabilities in the health system. Despite our efforts to evoke dissensus, the panelists ended up generating a consensus that aims to protect the underlying assumptions of the health system’s knowledge structure. Through inductive analysis of expert discourses, the data was analyzed through our research question “what constitutes a crisis-proof health system and a crisis-prone health system”. What is framed as a strength of the system by our panelists, namely the ability to maintain legitimacy, improve efficiency, and guarantee continuity, can still have questionable implications that are left ungrasped. A system’s theory approach illustrates how such effects can develop and escalate beyond the reach of social interventions, and thus be predisposed to cause objectionable yet concealed social crises. The discussion illustrates how these endogenous crisis dynamics could be seen to materialize in real-life cases.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Alpaslan, C. M., & Mitroff, I. I. (2011). Swans, swine, and swindlers: Coping with the growing threat of mega-crises and mega-messes. Stanford University Press.
2. Bayntun, C., Rockenschaub, G., & Murray, V. (2012). Developing a health system approach to disaster management: A qualitative analysis of the core literature to complement the WHO Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management. PLoS Currents. https://doi.org/10.1371/5028b6037259a
3. Boin, A., McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2008). Governing after crisis. In A. Boin, A. McConnell, & P. Hart (Eds.), Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning (pp. 3–30). Cambridge University Press.
4. Boin, A., Ekengren, M., & Rhinard, M. (2021). Understanding and acting upon a creeping crisis. In A. Boin, M. Ekengren, & M. Rhinard (Eds.), Understanding the creeping crisis (pp. 1–18). Palgrace Macmillan.
5. Cerrato, M. (2016). Consensus, sensus communis. Community. Política Común. https://doi.org/10.3998/pc.12322227.0010.005