Abstract
Abstract
Background
The umbilicus is crucial to the aesthetic appearance of the abdomen. With abdominoplasty and umbilicoplasty, placement of the umbilicus is essential and often left at the surgeon’s discretion. This study aims to investigate the ideal male umbilical shape and location by examining photographs of top male models in 2019.
Methods
In this observational study, we examined 81 photographs of top male models to assess different ratios based on anatomical landmarks and umbilical appearance.
Results
The ratio of the distance from the xiphoid to the center of umbilicus (XU) and corresponding distance from center of umbilicus to abdominal crease (UC) had the most reliability (ratio XU/UC, with average measurement: 1.68 ± 0.38), which placed the male navel at a similar position but marginally below the average female umbilicus. Our findings revealed that an oval horizontal is the ideal umbilical shape in males, which differs from what is most aesthetically pleasing in females (oval vertical). In addition, we introduced the SHAPE (Shape, Hood, Adiposity, Protrusion & Position, External piercing) classification for navel appearance to better define the umbilicus and its direct management.
Conclusions
This study establishes that the ideal male umbilicus differs from that of females; it should be placed at the XU/UC ratio of 1.68 ± 0.38 and aim for a horizontal shape with hooding (SHAPE: H II). The SHAPE classification facilitates a logical stepwise approach for the surgeon to refashion the umbilicus.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Funder
The University of Queensland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. Joseph WJ, Sinno S, Brownstone ND, Mirrer J, Thanik VD (2016) Creating the perfect umbilicus: a systematic review of recent literature. Aesthet Plast Surg 40:372–379
2. Pallua N, Markowicz MP, Grosse F, Walter S (2010) Aesthetically pleasant umbilicoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 64:722–725
3. Visconti G, Visconti E, Bonomo L, Salgarello M (2015) Concepts in navel aesthetic: a comprehensive surface anatomy analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 39:43–50
4. Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL (2000) In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:389–392
5. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2018) ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2018. Hanover
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献