Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of the Review
Climate change presents significant risks to the international trade and supply chain systems with potentially profound and cascading effects for the global economy. A robust international trade system may also be central to managing future climate risks. Here, we assess the treatment (or lack thereof) of trade in a selection of recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment and special reports using a quantitative text analysis. IPCC reports are considered the preeminent source of relevant climate change information and underpin international climate change negotiations.
Study Findings
Results show that international trade has not had substantial coverage in recent IPCC assessments. Relevant keywords associated with trade appear in very limited ways, generally in relation to the words “product” and “transport.” These keywords are often referring to emissions associated with transportation and the movement of food and global food systems. The influence of trade is given larger consideration with respect to the costs and trade-offs of climate mitigation policies, especially the interactions with food availability, that appear in Working Group III reports compared with the risks to trade from climate change impacts in Working Group II. Trade in relation to other economic sectors is largely absent as well as risks from potential climate-related trade disruption. There is almost no treatment of the potential impacts, risks, and adaptation strategies to manage the climate related-implications for international trade.
Recommendations
Given the importance of trade to economic growth, we recommend that additional attention be paid to trade and related economic issues in future IPCC assessment and special reports, specifically on the interactions of climate impacts and risks on trade and the potential for trade to moderate these risks. To achieve this, there must be efforts to increase the base of scientific literature focused on climate change and international trade as well as increased effort made among IPCC lead authors to review trade literature that may lie outside conventional climate change scholarship.
Funder
Canada Research Chairs
ArcticNet
Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network
Clear Seas
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference61 articles.
1. World Bank. World Bank Open Data. 2020. Accessed March, 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/.
2. World Bank. Trade Overview. 2020. Accessed March, 2020. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/overview/.
3. Eaton J, Kortum S, Neiman B, Romalis J. Trade and the global recession. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(11):3401–38.
4. National Bureau of Economic Research. Is trade good or bad for the environment? n.d. Accessed March, 2020. https://www.nber.org/digest/nov02/w9021.html.
5. Shapiro JS. Trade costs, CO2, and the environment. Am Econ J Econ Pol. 2016;8(4):220–54.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献