High-speed imaging the effect of snap-off distance and squeegee speed on the ink transfer mechanism of screen-printed carbon pastes
-
Published:2019-12-10
Issue:2
Volume:17
Page:447-459
-
ISSN:1547-0091
-
Container-title:Journal of Coatings Technology and Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Coat Technol Res
Author:
Potts Sarah-JaneORCID, Phillips ChrisORCID, Jewell EifionORCID, Clifford BenORCID, Lau Yin CheungORCID, Claypole TimORCID
Abstract
AbstractScreen printing is the most widely used process in the production of printed electronics due to its ability to consistently transfer inks containing a wide range of functional materials onto a range of substrates. However, despite its extensive use, the mechanism by which the ink is transferred through the mesh and onto the substrate is not fully understood. Existing theories are contradictory and lack experimental validation. Therefore, high-speed imaging was used in combination with a screen-printing simulation rig that was designed to provide good optical access to study ink deposition during the screen-printing process. The variation in the four stages of ink flow through the screen, described in the theory by Messerschmitt, has been quantified with respect to changes in snap-off distance and squeegee speed. Analyses of the images were compared with measurements of the ink properties and corroborated with analyses of the prints. This has provided a better understanding of the mechanism by which the ink transfers from the mesh to the substrate and subsequently separates in screen printing. This could be used as the basis for the development of predictive algorithms, as well as to improve the understanding of how to optimize print quality and performance.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Colloid and Surface Chemistry,Surfaces, Coatings and Films,Surfaces and Interfaces,General Chemistry
Reference32 articles.
1. Philip, B, Jewell, E, Greenwood, P, Weirman, C, “Material and Process Optimization Screen Printing Carbon Graphite Pastes for Mass Production of Heating Elements.” J. Manuf. Process., 22 (1) 185–191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.001 2. Tehrani, Z, Burwell, G, Azmi, MAM, Castaing, A, Rickman, R, Almarashi, J, et al., “Generic Epitaxial Graphene Biosensors for Ultrasensitive Detection of Cancer Risk Biomarker.” 2D Mater, 1 (2) 025004 (2014) 3. Tehrani, Z, Korochkina, T, Govindarajan, S, Thomas, DJ, Mahony, JO, Kettle, J, et al., “Ultra-Thin Flexible Screen Printed Rechargeable Polymer Battery for Wearable Electronic Applications.” Org. Electron., 26 (1) 386–394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.007 4. Baker, J, Hooper, K, Meroni, S, Pockett, A, McGettrick, J, Wei, Z, et al., “High Throughput Fabrication of Mesoporous Carbon Perovskite Solar Cells.” J. Mater. Chem. A., 5 (35) 18643–18650 (2017) 5. Zhang, L, Liu, T, Liu, L, Hu, M, Yang, Y, Mei, A, et al., “The Effect of Carbon Counter Electrodes on Fully Printable Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar Cells.” J. Mater. Chem. A., 3 (17) 9165–9170 (2015)
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|