Cross-Cultural Insights from Two Global Mental Health Studies: Self-Enhancement and Ingroup Biases
-
Published:2024-05-08
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1557-1874
-
Container-title:International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Ment Health Addiction
Author:
Kotera YasuhiroORCID, Ronaldson Amy, Hayes Daniel, Hunter-Brown Holly, McPhilbin Merly, Dunnett Danielle, Jebara Tesnime, Takhi Simran, Masuda Takahiko, Camacho Elizabeth, Bakolis Ioannis, Repper Julie, Meddings Sara, Stergiopoulos Vicky, Brophy Lisa, De Ruysscher Clara, Okoliyski Michail, Kubinová Petra, Eplov Lene, Toernes Charlotte, Narusson Dagmar, Tinland Aurélie, Puschner Bernd, Hiltensperger Ramona, Lucchi Fabio, Miyamoto Yuki, Castelein Stynke, Borg Marit, Klevan Trude Gøril, Meng Roger Tan Boon, Sornchai Chatdanai, Tiengtom Kruawon, Farkas Marianne, Jones Hannah Moreland, Moore Edith, Butler Ann, Mpango Richard, Tse Samson, Kondor Zsuzsa, Ryan Michael, Zuaboni Gianfranco, Elton Dan, Grant-Rowles Jason, McNaughton Rebecca, Harcla Claire, Vanderplasschen Wouter, Arbour Simone, Silverstone Denise, Bejerholm Ulrika, Powell Candice, Ochoa Susana, Garcia-Franco Mar, Tolonen Jonna, Yeo Caroline, Charles Ashleigh, Jepps Jessica, Simpson Adelabu, Kellermann Vanessa, Todowede Olamide, Asher Laura, Murakami Michio, Hopkins Liza, Jahau Ngurzoi, Arakawa Naoko, Scanferla Elisabetta, Henderson Claire, Slade Mike
Abstract
AbstractThis commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Bass, J., Chibanda, D., Petersen, I., Winkler, P., Sijbrandij, M., & Shidhaye, R. (2023). Introducing Cambridge prisms: Global mental health. Global Mental Health, 10, e7. 2. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 3. Cai, H., Wu, L., Shi, Y., Gu, R., & Sedikides, C. (2016). Self-enhancement among westerners and easterners: A cultural neuroscience approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1569–1569. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCAN/NSW072. 4. Charles, A., Korde, P., Newby, C., Grayzman, A., Hiltensperger, R., Mahlke, C., Moran, G., Nakku, J., Niwemuhwezi, J., Nixdorf, R., Paul, E., Puschner, B., Ramesh, M., Ryan, G. K., Shamba, D., Kalha, J., & Slade, M. (2022). Proportionate translation of study materials and measures in a multinational global health trial: Methodology development and implementation. British Medical Journal Open, 12(1), e058083. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058083. 5. Cowen, A. S., Keltner, D., Schroff, F., Jou, B., Adam, H., & Prasad, G. (2021). Sixteen facial expressions occur in similar contexts worldwide. Nature, 589(7841), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3037-7
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|