Cross-Cultural Insights from Two Global Mental Health Studies: Self-Enhancement and Ingroup Biases

Author:

Kotera YasuhiroORCID,Ronaldson Amy,Hayes Daniel,Hunter-Brown Holly,McPhilbin Merly,Dunnett Danielle,Jebara Tesnime,Takhi Simran,Masuda Takahiko,Camacho Elizabeth,Bakolis Ioannis,Repper Julie,Meddings Sara,Stergiopoulos Vicky,Brophy Lisa,De Ruysscher Clara,Okoliyski Michail,Kubinová Petra,Eplov Lene,Toernes Charlotte,Narusson Dagmar,Tinland Aurélie,Puschner Bernd,Hiltensperger Ramona,Lucchi Fabio,Miyamoto Yuki,Castelein Stynke,Borg Marit,Klevan Trude Gøril,Meng Roger Tan Boon,Sornchai Chatdanai,Tiengtom Kruawon,Farkas Marianne,Jones Hannah Moreland,Moore Edith,Butler Ann,Mpango Richard,Tse Samson,Kondor Zsuzsa,Ryan Michael,Zuaboni Gianfranco,Elton Dan,Grant-Rowles Jason,McNaughton Rebecca,Harcla Claire,Vanderplasschen Wouter,Arbour Simone,Silverstone Denise,Bejerholm Ulrika,Powell Candice,Ochoa Susana,Garcia-Franco Mar,Tolonen Jonna,Yeo Caroline,Charles Ashleigh,Jepps Jessica,Simpson Adelabu,Kellermann Vanessa,Todowede Olamide,Asher Laura,Murakami Michio,Hopkins Liza,Jahau Ngurzoi,Arakawa Naoko,Scanferla Elisabetta,Henderson Claire,Slade Mike

Abstract

AbstractThis commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3