Is Australian Flora Unsuitable for the Bow-and-Arrow?

Author:

George NicholasORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe bow-and-arrow was not manufactured or widely used by Indigenous Peoples within the Australian continent, and the suitability of woody Australian plant species for constructing bows is poorly understood. The mechanical and physical properties of 326 plant species, including species highly suitable for self-bows and 106 native Australian species, were analyzed and compared using principal component analysis. Additionally, qualitative information regarding the use of Australian woods for bows was obtained from bow-making internet forums. The results suggest that Australian woods have combinations of properties that make them sub-optimal for bows compared to common woods from other parts of the world. The findings may explain the historical absence of bow-and-arrow technology on the Australian continent. Future work is needed to collect data from a broader range of woody Australian species, along with empirical research to assess the suitability of Australian woods for bow-making. The work also demonstrates, for the first time, that principal component analysis is a useful technique for exploring the suitability of woods for self-bows and should be investigated further for this purpose.

Funder

Curtin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference82 articles.

1. Alden, H. A. 1995. Hardwoods of North America. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-83. Madison, WI., United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

2. Allely, S., T. Baker, P. Comstock, J. Hamm, J. Hamm, R. Hardcastle, J. Massey, and J. Strunk. 1992. The traditional bowyers bible. Volume one. Guildford, Connecticut: Bois d’Arc Press. First Lyons Press Edition 2000.

3. Allely, S., T. Baker, P. Comstock, S. Gardner, J. Hamm, M. Lotz, T. Mills, D. Perry, M. St.Louis, J. Welch, and M. Westvang. 2008. The traditional bowyers bible. Volume four. Guildford, Connecticut: Bois d’Arc Press. First Lyons Press.

4. Angelbeck, B., and I. Cameron. 2014. The Faustian bargain of technological change: Evaluating the socioeconomic effects of the bow and arrow transition in the Coast Salish past. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 36: 93-109.

5. Antony, F., L. Jordan, L. R. Schimleck, A. Clark III, R. A. Souter, and R. F. Daniels. 2011. Regional variation in wood modulus of elasticity (stiffness) and modulus of rupture (strength) of planted loblolly pine in the United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 1522-1533.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3