Author:
Nitzan Shmuel,Tajika Tomoya
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Decision Sciences
Reference16 articles.
1. Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. (1996). Information aggregation, rationality and the Condorcet jury theorem. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 34–45
2. Baharad, E., Koppel, M., Goldberger, J., & Nitzan, S. (2011). Distilling the wisdom of crowds: weighted aggregation of decisions on multiple issues. JAAMS, 22(1), 31–42
3. Baharad, E., Koppel, M., Goldberger, J., & Nitzan, S. (2012). Beyond Condorcet: Optimal judgment aggregation using voting records. Theory and Decision, 72, 113–130
4. Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19(2), 317–343
5. Ben Yashar, R., & Milchtaich, I. (2007). First and second best voting rules in committees. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 453–486