Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates the use of pollen elastically scattered light images for species identification. The aim was to identify the best recognition algorithms for pollen classification based on the scattering images. A series of laboratory experiments with a Rapid-E device of Plair S.A. was conducted collecting scattering images and fluorescence spectra from pollen of 15 plant genera. The collected scattering data were supplied to 32 different setups of 8 computer vision models based on deep neural networks. The models were trained to classify the pollen types, and their performance was compared for the test sub-samples withheld from the training. Evaluation showed that most of the tested computer vision models convincingly outperform the basic convolutional neural network used in our previous studies: the accuracy gain was approaching 10% for best setups. The models of the Weakly Supervised Object Detection approach turned out to be the most accurate, but also slow. However, even the best setups still did not provide sufficient recognition accuracy barely reaching 65%–70% in the repeated tests. They also showed many false positives when applied to real-life time series collected by Rapid-E. Similar to the previous studies, fusion of the new scattering models with the fluorescence-based identification demonstrated almost 15% higher skills than either of the approaches alone reaching 77–83% of the overall classification accuracy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Plant Science,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference41 articles.
1. Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press.
2. Boldeanu, M., Cucu, H., Burileanu, C., & Mărmureanu, L. (2021). Multi-input convolutional neural networks for automatic pollen classification. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 11707. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411707
3. CEN/EN 16868:2019 (2019). Ambient air-Sampling and analysis of airborne pollen grains and fungal spores for networks related to allergy networks–Volumetric Hirst method. European Standard, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium (p. 38).
4. Crouzy, B., Stella, M., Konzelmann, T., Calpini, B., & Clot, B. (2016). All-optical automatic pollen identification: Towards an operational system. Atmospheric Environment, 140, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.062
5. Daunys, G., Šukienė, L., Vaitkevičius, L., Valiulis, G., Sofiev, M., & Šaulienė, I. (2021). Clustering approach for the analysis of the fluorescent bioaerosol collected by an automatic detector. PLoS ONE, 16, e0247284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247284
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献