MONITORING QUALITY INDICATORS IN A MEDIUM-SIZED LABORATORY OF SOUTH BENGAL: MOVING TOWARDS ACCREDITATION

Author:

Das Dipmala1,Deb Roy Asitava2,Singh Shalini3,Goswami Bimal4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology, Avishkar Diagnostics, Durgapur-713206, West Bengal.

2. Laboratory Director, Avishkar Diagnostics, Durgapur-713206, West Bengal.

3. CEO, Avishkar Diagnostics, Durgapur-713206, West Bengal.

4. Quality Manager, Avishkar Diagnostics, Durgapur-713206, West Bengal.

Abstract

Introduction: Documenting and monitoring quality indicators are important to improve the quality of a laboratory. The objective of this study was to record the quality indicators of a clinical laboratory and prepare it for accreditation by National Accreditation Board of Laboratories (NABL) as per ISO 15189. Materials And Methods: A total of 9 quality indicators in different phases of sample analyses viz. pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical were monitored for 21459 samples over a period of one year. Results: Incomplete requisition forms were the most common outlier (2.5%) in the pre-analytical phase followed by samples not maintaining cold chain during transport (2.1%). Internal non-conformance with quality control was seen in 0.6% of samples in analytical phase. In post analytical phase, turnaround time (TAT) could not be maintained for 8% of the samples. Conclusion: Monitoring and recording quality indicators give us an idea about the performance of a medical laboratory. Therefore, working with a goal to reduce quality indicator outliers will improve the quality of a laboratory and ultimately enhance patient care. Moreover, it can help comparing different laboratories in a particular area based on performance.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference15 articles.

1. Sachin Kale, Anuradha Patil, C. P. Bhale & Smita Mulay: Laboratory Quality Indicators: A Three year study at a Medical College Laboratory. International Journal of current Medical and Applied sciences; 2018, 20(1), 04-06.

2. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F and Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clinical chemistry 2002:48;691-98.

3. Agarwal R, Chaturvedi S, Chhillar N, Goyal R, Pant I and Tripathi CB. Role of intervention on laboratory performance – evaluation of quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital. Ind J clin biochem 2012: 27(1);61-68.

4. International organization for standardization (2012) ISO 15189: medical laboratories requirements for quality and competence. Geneva.

5. UNI 11097(2003) quality management – quality indicators and quality management synoptical tables- general guidelines.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3