FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES TREATED BY PHILOS PLATING
-
Published:2022-08-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:14-18
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PIJR
Author:
Kumar Patnala Ashok1, Sai Bolisetty Geetha Sri2, V.G. Vijay Kumar P.S. V.R.2, Naveen Sunkara2
Affiliation:
1. Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Orthopaedics, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, A.P. India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, A.P. India.
Abstract
Introduction Proximal humeral fractures are now recognized as an increasingly common fracture,
accounting for 4%–5% of all fractures and 45% of all humeral fractures [1,2]. It is the third most common
fracture, in people above 65 years of age, after fractures of the hip and distal radius [3]. These fractures have a bimodal
distribution occurring either in young people after high energy trauma or in those older than 50 years with low- velocity injuries
like simple fall [3]. 85% of these fractures are minimally displaced and are effectively treated with immobilization followed by
early motion. The remaining 15% of these are either displaced or unstable. These fare poorly with non-operative treatment and
are better treated with surgical intervention. Surgical treatment is necessary especially in young patients and active elderly
people in order to prevent minimal dislocations of tuberosity or articular surface from compromising the long-term articular
function. This study was planned to evaluate the outcome of proximal humerus fractures managed with PHILOS plate after
approval by the Institutional Ethical Board. Aims And Objectives To evaluate the efcacy of PHILOS plate in the treatment of
proximal humeral fractures and assess its functional outcome. To assess any complications that could arise postoperatively
Early rehabilitation of the patient Methods And Materials Study Design: Hospital Based Prospective study. Study Period:
October 2019 to September 2022. Study Setup: Study is conducted in Department of Orthopaedics, Andhra Medical College,
Visakhapatnam. Study Population: Patients attending emergency/orthopaedic OP and admitted in department of
orthopaedics in King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam with proximal humerus fractures and are classied according to Neer's
Classication Sample Size: 30 patients admitted in the Department of Orthopaedics, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam
with proximal humerus fractures in the above said period. Results We have included 30 proximal humeral fractures in our
study. Males dominated and left side is more common than right. Domestic falls are common than road trafc accidents. 2-part
fractures are more common than 3- and 4-part fractures. All of them are treated with PHILOS stable angled plate.
Complications like stiffness, screw penetration and supercial infection occurred in our study which are dealt appropriately.
Signicantly, we could prevent varus malunion which is notable in our study. Rehabilitation started early with pendulum
exercises and could achieve good range of useful movements for most of the cases. Average range of radiological union is 13.5
weeks. Conclusion PHILOS plate, stable, angled construct is used in all our cases and the results evaluation done with
Constant Murley score which ranged 54 to 87. Our average score is 67.43 which is in concurrence with few of the studies. The
rehabilitation after operation started early with pendulum exercises as soon as the patients compliance within the limits of
pain. The range of movements in our study, abduction maximum range obtained is 120 to 150 degrees and forward exion 90
to 120 degrees and rotations average score is 7. Though we have few complications like stiffness of shoulder (5), AVN (1), intraarticular screw penetration (1), supercial infection (1) and subacromial impingement (1), we have dealt with all these
complications appropriately. Signicantly, varus malunion did not occur in our study
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Immunology,Rheumatology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology,Rheumatology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery,Insect Science,Developmental Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,General Medicine,Insect Science,Genetics,General Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine
Reference10 articles.
1. M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 2006;442:87–92. 2. Spence RJ. Fractures of the proximal humerus. Curr Opin Orthop 2003;14:269–80. 3.Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 1996;18(3):209S–13S 3. Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS et al. Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fi xation [J]. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17(5):31925. 4. Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R et al. Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(2):295-300. 5. Moonot P, Ashwood N, Hamlet M. Early results for treatment of three- and fourpart fractures of the proximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(9):1206–09.
|
|