Affiliation:
1. Senior Resident, Dept. of Radio diagnosis, PGIMS, Rohtak.
2. Junior Resident, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. PGIMS, Rohtak.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in Indian women. Breast cancer is a
signicant cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. Mammography and ultrasound are used as the
rst line of investigation for the early detection and localization of breast tumors. Mammography has high sensitivity in case of
patients with fatty parenchyma however low sensitivity in case of patients with dense breasts, implants, and post-surgical scar,
thus breast MRI with higher sensitivity and specicity due to its ability to depict excellent soft-tissue contrast has become
increasingly important in the detection of breast cancer. DCE-MRI has improved specicity in characterizing breast lesions by
analysis of time-intensity curves. Diffusion-weighted imaging can improve the sensitivity and specicity of MRI in the
evaluation of breast lesions by calculating the ADC values a quantitative measure that is a useful tool for tumor detection and
differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted MRI andObjective:
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions and to compare the ndings of
diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic enhanced MRI with histopathological or FNAC ndings. A totalMaterial And Methods:
of 30 patients with palpable breast lumps with either positive or negative ndings on mammography and ultrasound were
included in this study. All patients included in this study rst underwent lm-screen mammography. Ultrasonography was done
with convex and linear probes. This was followed by MRI. T1W axial, T2W axial, SPAIR/ Fat Saturated T2 weighted axial images
were acquired in appropriate imaging planes. Diffusion-weighted images were obtained using b values of 0 and 1000 and
ADC values were calculated. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR was performed using fat-suppressed 3D T1 weighted images
after injection of gadolinium and time-intensity curves were generated. A single precontrast scan was followed by 4 post-
contrast scans which were obtained for a total duration of 4 min 24 seconds. Findings of the MRI (Diffusion-weighted and
dynamic contrast enhancement) were analyzed and correlated with histopathological and FNAC ndings to evaluate their use
as a diagnostic modality. A total of 30 female patients presenting with palpable breast lumps were included in theResults:
study. Out of 30 patients, 20 cases were malignant (66.67%) and 10 cases were benign (33.3%). Fibroadenoma accounted for a
majority of benign lesions (4 out of 10 benign lesions) while IDC accounted for the majority of malignant lesions (15 out of 20
malignant lesions). Dynamic CE-MR is a reliable tool for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions based on
kinetic curves. 7 out of 10 benign lesions showed a type I curve while the rest showed a type II curve while the majority (15/20) of
malignant lesions showed a type III curve. 8 out of 10 benign breast lesions did not show restricted diffusion on DWI while all
malignant lesions showed restricted diffusion on DWI. In our study, the mean ADC value for benign lesions was 1.59 x 10 mm/s
while the mean ADC value for malignant lesions was 0.88 x 10 mm/s. Using the ROC curve, the cut-off value of ADC was
calculated to be 1.19 x 10 mm/s which gives sensitivity and specicity of 95% and 90% respectively. The individual sensitivity for
DCE-MRI and DWI was calculated to be 95% and 95% while the individual specicity for DCE-MRI and DWI was calculated to
be 70% and 90% respectively. After a combined analysis of DCE-MRI and DWI using a positive result from any of the two
techniques as malignancy, the sensitivity and specicity were 95% and 80% respectively.
Reference18 articles.
1. T Button, K Dulaimy, P. Fisher, B O Heab. Addition of MRS and perfussion MRI to conventional Dynamic contrast MRI improves specificity in detection of breast malignancy. Proct Int. soc Magn Reson Med (2002)
2. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.
3. Tezca, Ozturk, Uslu et al. The Role of Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Breast Lesions Presenting Washout Curve. Canadian Association of Radiologists’ Journal 2020;1-10
4. Savannah C Partridge and Elizibith. S Mcdonald. Diffusion weighted MRI of the breast; Protocol optimization, guidelines for interpretation and practical clinical application.Magn Reson Imaging Clin.N Am . 2013 Aug :21 (3): 601-624
5. Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, Eduardo Figueiredo4et al. Assessment of Breast Lesions with Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparing the Use of Different b Values. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2009;193: 1030-1035