INCIDENCE, INDICATION AND OUTCOME OF EMERGENCY PERIPARTUM HYSTERECTOMIES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
-
Published:2023-01-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:48-50
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PIJR
Author:
Saini Priya1, Kour Arshdeep1, Lamba Jyotsana2, Kour Simrenjeet3, Kour Arshdeep4
Affiliation:
1. 3 Year Obstetrics & Gynaecology Resident,Govt.Medical College Jammu 2. M.D. (Obstetrics & Gynaecology), Associate Professor, SMGS Hospital, Govt. Medical College Jammu 3. M.D.Obstetrics & Gynaecology),Senior Resident MMIMSR 4. 3 Year Obstetrics & Gynaecology Resident, Govt. Medical College Jammu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is the life-saving procedure to control a life-threatening
haemorrhage performed at the moment or within 24 hrs of delivery (caesarean or vaginal). It is linked to a substantial
percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality.AIM:To estimate the incidence,indication,and outcome of emergency
peripartum hysterectomy over a 1-year period in a tertiary care hospital and the leading cause of the increased no of
hysterectomies in the defined time interval. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective study done in SMGS
HOSPITAL, JAMMU, a tertiary care hospital. This study included all women who underwent emergency peripartum
hysterectomy over a span of 1 year (August 1,2021,to July 31,2022).Detailed review including previous obstetric history,
details of index pregnancy, an indication of peripartum hysterectomy, outcome, and infant morbidity was taken into
account. RESULTS: During the course of the research, there were 33 women who had undergone peripartum
hysterectomy. The incidence rate was 1.8 cases per 1000 births. The predominant indications were placenta accreta
(69%),Atonic PPH (Postpartum haemorrhage) (18%),and uterine rupture (9%).Emergency peripartum hysterectomies
were more prevalent after caesarean section (73%) than vaginal births (27%).Previous caesarean,multiparity,any past
uterine surgeries, and older age were risk factors. 48% of women needed intensive care postoperatively.The common
maternal complications were bladder injury (intraop) (12%), febrile morbidity (18%), disseminated intravascular
coagulation (DIC) (8%),acute kidney injury (AKI) (9%),and wound infection (10%).There were 2 maternal deaths (6%)
following emergency peripartum hysterectomy. The patient's condition was taken into consideration while deciding
whether a complete or partial hysterectomy would be best.CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal placentation,placenta accreta,
has surpassed uterine atony as the leading cause of emergency hysterectomy during the perinatal period in recent
years. The primary reason for this is the growing popularity of caesarean sections. Peripartum hysterectomies for
diagnosed cases of placenta accreta with antenatal anticipation of the risk factors,a multidisciplinary approach and ICU
backup had better outcomes with less morbidity.An important factor influencing the maternal outcome was the timing of
the decision to perform a peripartum hysterectomy which is neither too early nor too late
Publisher
World Wide Journals
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous),General Engineering,General Materials Science,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,Biomedical Engineering,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,General Chemistry,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials,Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,Ceramics and Composites,Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry,General Engineering,Polymers and Plastics,Organic Chemistry
Reference9 articles.
1. B. Sharma, P. Sikka, V. Jain, K. Jain, R. Bagga, and V. Suri, “Peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary care hospital: Epidemiology and outcomesImproving outcomes for peripartum hysterectomy: Still a long way to go!,” J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 324–328, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_380_16. 2. O. Yucel, I. Ozdemir, N. Yucel, and A. Somunkiran, “Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A 9-year review,” Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 84–87, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0124-4. 3. A. Kwee, M. L. Bots, G. H. A. Visser, and H. W. Bruinse, “Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A prospective study in the Netherlands,” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.012. 4. J. Rahman, M. Al-Ali, H. O. Qutub, S. S. Al-Suleiman, F. E. Al-Jama, and M. S. Rahman, “Emergency obstetric hysterectomy in a university hospital: A 25-year review,” J. Obstet. Gynaecol. (Lahore)., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2008, doi: 10.1080/01443610701816885. 5. L. S. M. Machado, “Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome,” N. Am. J. Med. Sci., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 358–361, 2011, doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.358.
|
|