COMPARISON OF ENDOMETRIAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA & WHO CLASSIFIED ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA IN PREDICTING THE RISK OF PROGRESSION TO ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA

Abstract

Background: Endometrial hyperplasia is the precursor lesion of most endometrial cancers of endometrioid type. The most commonly used classication system for endometrial hyperplasia is WHO 1994 classication system in which architecture disruption and cytological atypia are used to identify four types of endometrial hyperplasia including simple or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia. Newer EIN diagnosis by cytological atypia is of great consideration for the progression to endometrial cancer. Material And Methods: The study consists of 100 cases of WHO classied endometrial hyperplasia for period of 4 yrs from 2015 to 2019. Type of sampling procedures- dilation & curettage, endometrial biopsy and fractional curettage. Objective: 1. To discuss revised criteria for recognition of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). 2. To nd out the sensitivity of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) classication in predicting the risk of malignancy. Results: This study consists of 100 cases of endometrial hyperplasia. Patients were mostly postmenopausal & presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding. From WHO classied endometrial lesions, 2 out of 35 cases of simple typical hyperplasia, 10 out of 14 cases of complex typical hyperplasia,12 out of 20 cases of simple atypical hyperplasia and 20 out of 21 cases of complex atypical hyperplasia were reclassied as EI N. Conclusion: To estimate the risk of progression to carcinoma and guide clinical management, the histo-pathologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplastic lesion is very important, specially the diagnosis of EIN lesions. EIN carries a much greater risk of progression to endometrial cancer than other WHO classied endometrial hyperplasia.