VACCUM IS THE PREFERRED INSTRUMENT AMONG OBSTERICIANS IN RECENT TIMES

Author:

Gnanasekaran Vijayalakshmi1,Kanamma Shantha2,Dhinakaran Shanthi3,Kalaiselvi Jikki3

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, Department of OBG, ACS medical college and Hospital, Velappanchavadi, Chennai – 600077.

2. General Practitioner, Chennai.

3. Professor, Department of OBG, ACS medical college and Hospital, Velappanchavadi, Chennai – 600077.

Abstract

Obstetricians must be able to perform operative vaginal birth (OVB). It is the most common obstetric emergency intervention, and it necessitates a high level of expertise. To nd out which tool obstetricians prefer when doing surgical vaginal births, as well as the prevalence and hazards of vacuum or forceps assisted vaginal deliveries (AVD). The ACS Medical and Hospital in Chennai conducted this cross-sectional investigation. The survey comprised 500 obstetricians in all. All obstetricians in Chennai were issued an online survey. The best approach for a given situation, tool preference [vacuum or forceps], and perspectives on the difculties associated with both vacuum and forceps use during vaginal delivery were all investigated. We calculated averages and percentages for the overall group and different subgroups based on the responses. The statistical analysis comprised a risk assessment of the result with exposure as an appropriate p-value. The questionnaire had a response rate of 92 percent (460/500). According to the data, obstetricians preferred vacuum because it was easier to use. The two groups had identical baseline characteristics. The most prevalent complication was a failed vacuum owing to cup slippage (65%), followed by caput succedaneum (22%), both of which were statistically signicant. The most important nding was that maternal injuries in the vacuum group were only 3%, which was signicantly lower than maternal injuries in the forceps group (70%) with a p-value of 0.001. The majority of obstetricians seemed to prefer using a vacuum during delivery. The use of a vacuum extractor instead of forceps for assisted delivery appeared to lower maternal morbidity, whereas neonatal injuries were more prevalent in vacuum-delivered babies. The equipment chosen should be tailored to the patient's needs as well as the obstetrician's knowledge and skill.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3