Abstract
While culture is affirmed by the Frankfurt School in an elitist and narrow framework; the school of British Cultural Studies takes the concept in a much broader context, including all doings of subjects. Especially as a musicologist, in Theodor Adorno's texts, genres such as jazz and Stravinsky-style classical music are devalued; Atonal music that emphasizes the variety of notes in the composition is affirmed. The school of British Cultural Studies, on the other hand, takes care of the more mundane forms of culture and finds a resilient element in popular culture in a way that restores the dignity of the working-class culture that rooted its members. A working class subject will not have the chance to access and analyze the high cultural forms glorified by the Frankfurt School, and to use these forms effectively in cultural consumption activities. This study aims to evaluate this contrast in the approaches to culture of Frankfurt School and British Cultural Studies, which are included in Critical Communication Studies. It will question whether it is necessary to limit the resistance of the subjects within the higher forms of culture as the Frankfurt School claims. From the opposite perspective, it will question the possibility that the effort to exist within the structure can be realized through more casual and popular forms as Cultural Studies advocates. This study, which does not feed on a stance in favor of the Frankfurt School or British Cultural Studies, aims to evaluate the thesis of both approaches through the daily life and cultural production-consumption activities of the subjects.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference13 articles.
1. Adorno, Theodor (1985). “Fetish Character in Music and Regression of Listening”. Esthetic Theory and Cultural Criticism. Der. Andrew Arato & Eike Gebhardt. New York: Contınuum, 270-300.
2. Adorno, Theodor (2002). Aesthetic Theory. Çev. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Continuum.
3. Adorno, Theodor ve Horkheimer, Max (2010). Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiği. Çev. Elif Öztarhan, Nihat Ülner. İstanbul: Kabalcı.
4. Adorno, Theodor, (2017). Otoritaryen Kişilik Üzerine. Çev. Doğan Şahiner. İstanbul: Say Yayıncılık.
5. Akgün, Hakkı ve Arık, Emel (2021). “İngiliz Kültürel Çalışmalar Ekolü ve Medya Mahallesi Haber Programının Alımlama Analizi”. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 8(1): 113-128.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献