Re-reading Culture within the Framework of the Frankfurt School and the British Approach to Cultural Studies

Author:

TANSEL İLİC Deniz1

Affiliation:

1. BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

While culture is affirmed by the Frankfurt School in an elitist and narrow framework; the school of British Cultural Studies takes the concept in a much broader context, including all doings of subjects. Especially as a musicologist, in Theodor Adorno's texts, genres such as jazz and Stravinsky-style classical music are devalued; Atonal music that emphasizes the variety of notes in the composition is affirmed. The school of British Cultural Studies, on the other hand, takes care of the more mundane forms of culture and finds a resilient element in popular culture in a way that restores the dignity of the working-class culture that rooted its members. A working class subject will not have the chance to access and analyze the high cultural forms glorified by the Frankfurt School, and to use these forms effectively in cultural consumption activities. This study aims to evaluate this contrast in the approaches to culture of Frankfurt School and British Cultural Studies, which are included in Critical Communication Studies. It will question whether it is necessary to limit the resistance of the subjects within the higher forms of culture as the Frankfurt School claims. From the opposite perspective, it will question the possibility that the effort to exist within the structure can be realized through more casual and popular forms as Cultural Studies advocates. This study, which does not feed on a stance in favor of the Frankfurt School or British Cultural Studies, aims to evaluate the thesis of both approaches through the daily life and cultural production-consumption activities of the subjects.

Publisher

kulturarastirmalari

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference13 articles.

1. Adorno, Theodor (1985). “Fetish Character in Music and Regression of Listening”. Esthetic Theory and Cultural Criticism. Der. Andrew Arato & Eike Gebhardt. New York: Contınuum, 270-300.

2. Adorno, Theodor (2002). Aesthetic Theory. Çev. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Continuum.

3. Adorno, Theodor ve Horkheimer, Max (2010). Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiği. Çev. Elif Öztarhan, Nihat Ülner. İstanbul: Kabalcı.

4. Adorno, Theodor, (2017). Otoritaryen Kişilik Üzerine. Çev. Doğan Şahiner. İstanbul: Say Yayıncılık.

5. Akgün, Hakkı ve Arık, Emel (2021). “İngiliz Kültürel Çalışmalar Ekolü ve Medya Mahallesi Haber Programının Alımlama Analizi”. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 8(1): 113-128.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. İletişim Araştırmalarındaki Güncel Eğilimler Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme;Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi;2023-12-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3