Off-Label Use of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Survey of Italian Psychiatrists

Author:

Aguglia Andrea12,Serafini Gianluca12,Nebbia Jacopo12,Salvi Virginio3,Martinotti Giovanni45,Corbo Mariangela4,Signorelli Maria Salvina6,Mineo Ludovico6,Mencacci Claudio3,Di Sciascio Guido7,Biggio Giovanni8,Aguglia Eugenio6,Amore Mario12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Psychiatry Unit, Genoa, Italy.

2. IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

3. Department of Neuroscience, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

4. Department of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Science, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Italy.

5. Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Clinical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Herts, UK.

6. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Psychiatric Clinic University Hospital “Gaspare Rodolico,” University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

7. Department of Medical Basic Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

8. Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, CNR, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Abstract

The guidelines for borderline personality disorder (BPD) treatment suggest non-pharmacological treatment as the first option, but second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are among the overprescribed medications. This study aimed to explore Italian psychiatrists' attitudes toward off-label use of SGAs in BPD. A randomly selected sample of Italian psychiatrists completed a questionnaire regarding off-label prescription of SGAs. Most respondents reported the off-label use of SGAs. Among the reasons supporting the prescription of SGAs, the presence of strong published data was the most determining factor (51.5%). The SGA olanzapine is considered the most appropriate, followed by quetiapine and aripiprazole. Although off-label prescription of SGAs represents a common clinical practice in accordance with a worldwide trend, the use of long-acting injection formulations was considered inappropriate by 69% of psychiatrists in our sample. Our results reiterate the discrepancy between everyday clinical practice and international recommendations, and show how relevant the literature is in off-label drug prescription.

Publisher

Guilford Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3