A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA1c in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison

Author:

Addala Ananta1ORCID,Auzanneau Marie23ORCID,Miller Kellee4,Maier Werner35,Foster Nicole4,Kapellen Thomas6,Walker Ashby7,Rosenbauer Joachim38,Maahs David M.19,Holl Reinhard W.23

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

2. University of Ulm, Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, Ulm, Germany

3. German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany

4. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL

5. Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany

6. University of Leipzig, Department of Women and Child Health, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Leipzig, Germany

7. Health Equity Initiatives, UF Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

8. Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany

9. Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE As diabetes technology use in youth increases worldwide, inequalities in access may exacerbate disparities in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). We hypothesized that an increasing gap in diabetes technology use by socioeconomic status (SES) would be associated with increased HbA1c disparities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Participants aged <18 years with diabetes duration ≥1 year in the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange (T1DX, U.S., n = 16,457) and Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV, Germany, n = 39,836) registries were categorized into lowest (Q1) to highest (Q5) SES quintiles. Multiple regression analyses compared the relationship of SES quintiles with diabetes technology use and HbA1c from 2010–2012 to 2016–2018. RESULTS HbA1c was higher in participants with lower SES (in 2010–2012 and 2016–2018, respectively: 8.0% and 7.8% in Q1 and 7.6% and 7.5% in Q5 for DPV; 9.0% and 9.3% in Q1 and 7.8% and 8.0% in Q5 for T1DX). For DPV, the association between SES and HbA1c did not change between the two time periods, whereas for T1DX, disparities in HbA1c by SES increased significantly (P < 0.001). After adjusting for technology use, results for DPV did not change, whereas the increase in T1DX was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS Although causal conclusions cannot be drawn, diabetes technology use is lowest and HbA1c is highest in those of the lowest SES quintile in the T1DX, and this difference for HbA1c broadened in the past decade. Associations of SES with technology use and HbA1c were weaker in the DPV registry.

Funder

Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

German Center for Diabetes Research

German Diabetes Association

European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 156 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3