Prevalence and Risk Factors for Urinary Incontinence in Overweight and Obese Diabetic Women

Author:

Phelan Suzanne1,Kanaya Alka M.2,Subak Leslee L.3,Hogan Patricia E.4,Espeland Mark A.4,Wing Rena R.5,Burgio Kathryn L.6,DiLillo Vicki7,Gorin Amy A.8,West Delia S.9,Brown Jeanette S.3

Affiliation:

1. Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California;

2. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California;

3. Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Urology and Epidemiology, UCSF Women's Health Clinical Research Center, San Francisco, California;

4. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;

5. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island;

6. University of Alabama at Birmingham and Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama;

7. Department of Psychology, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio;

8. Department of Psychology, Center for Health, Intervention, and Prevention, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut;

9. Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence among different racial/ethnic groups of overweight and obese women with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study, a randomized clinical trial with 2,994 overweight/obese women with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS Weekly incontinence (27%) was reported more often than other diabetes-associated complications, including retinopathy (7.5%), microalbuminuria (2.2%), and neuropathy (1.5%). The prevalence of weekly incontinence was highest among non-Hispanic whites (32%) and lowest among African Americans (18%), and Asians (12%) (P < 0.001). Asian and African American women had lower odds of weekly incontinence compared with non-Hispanic whites (75 and 55% lower, respectively; P < 0.001). Women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 had a higher odds of overall and stress incontinence (55–85% higher; P < 0.03) compared with that for nonobese women. Risk factors for overall incontinence, as well as for stress and urgency incontinence, included prior hysterectomy (40–80% increased risk; P < 0.01) and urinary tract infection in the prior year (55–90% increased risk; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among overweight and obese women with type 2 diabetes, urinary incontinence is highly prevalent and far exceeds the prevalence of other diabetes complications. Racial/ethnic differences in incontinence prevalence are similar to those in women without diabetes, affecting non-Hispanic whites more than Asians and African Americans. Increasing obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) was the strongest modifiable risk factor for overall incontinence and stress incontinence in this diverse cohort.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Difficulty with holding urine among older persons in a geographically defined community: prevalence and correlates;Wetle;J Am Geriatr Soc,1995

2. Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity;Thom;J Urol,2006

3. A systematic review of overweight and obesity as risk factors and targets for clinical intervention for urinary incontinence in women;Hunskaar;Neurourol Urodyn,2008

4. The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry;Noblett;Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,1997

5. Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center. Prevention of Urinary and Fecal Incontinence in Adults.Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007 (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 161). Available from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS88803. Accessed 19 December 2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3