How Does Empagliflozin Reduce Cardiovascular Mortality? Insights From a Mediation Analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

Author:

Inzucchi Silvio E.1ORCID,Zinman Bernard2,Fitchett David3,Wanner Christoph4,Ferrannini Ele5ORCID,Schumacher Martin6,Schmoor Claudia6,Ohneberg Kristin6,Johansen Odd Erik7,George Jyothis T.8,Hantel Stefan9,Bluhmki Erich9,Lachin John M.10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Endocrinology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

2. Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. St. Michael’s Hospital, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Würzburg University Clinic, Würzburg, Germany

5. CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy

6. Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

7. Boehringer Ingelheim Norway KS, Asker, Norway

8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany

9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany

10. Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In the BI 10773 (Empagliflozin) Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) trial involving 7,020 patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular (CV) disease, empagliflozin given in addition to standard of care reduced the risk of CV death by 38% versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.49, 0.77]). This exploratory mediation analysis assesses the extent to which treatment group differences in covariates during the trial contributed to CV death risk reduction with empagliflozin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Effects of potential mediators, identified post hoc, on the HR for CV death with empagliflozin versus placebo were analyzed by Cox regression models, with treatment group adjusted for the baseline value of the variable and its change from baseline or updated mean (i.e., considering all prior values), each as a time-dependent covariate. HRs were compared with a model without adjustment for covariates. Multivariable analyses also were performed. RESULTS Changes in hematocrit and hemoglobin mediated 51.8% and 48.9%, respectively, of the effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on the risk of CV death on the basis of changes from baseline, with similar results in analyses on the basis of updated means. Smaller mediation effects (maximum 29.3%) were observed for uric acid, fasting plasma glucose, and HbA1c. In multivariable models, which incorporated effects of empagliflozin on hematocrit, fasting glucose, uric acid, and urine albumin:creatinine ratio, the combined changes from baseline provided 85.2% mediation, whereas updated mean analyses provided 94.6% mediation of the effect of empagliflozin on CV death. CONCLUSIONS In this exploratory analysis from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, changes in markers of plasma volume were the most important mediators of the reduction in risk of CV death with empagliflozin versus placebo.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes;Zinman;N Engl J Med,2015

2. Boehringer Ingelheim. Jardiance® (empagliflozin) tablets prescribing information. 2016. Available from http://bidocs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/BIWebAccess/ViewServlet.ser?docBase=renetnt&folderPath=/Prescribing+Information/PIs/Jardiance/jardiance.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2017

3. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes mellitus: cardiovascular and kidney effects, potential mechanisms, and clinical applications;Heerspink;Circulation,2016

4. Can a shift in fuel energetics explain the beneficial cardiorenal outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study? A unifying hypothesis;Mudaliar;Diabetes Care,2016

5. SGLT2 inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms;Sattar;Diabetologia,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3