Diabetes Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service Plans: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry

Author:

Essien Utibe R.12,Tang Yuanyuan3,Figueroa Jose F.4,Litam Terrence Michael A.2,Tang Fengming3,Jones Philip G.3,Patel Ravi5,Wadhera Rishi K.6,Desai Nihar R.7,Mehta Sanjeev N.8,Kosiborod Mikhail N.3,Vaduganathan Muthiah9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

2. 2Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA

3. 3Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO

4. 4Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA

5. 5Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

6. 6Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

7. 7Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

8. 8Clinical, Behavioral, and Outcomes Research Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA

9. 9Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Medicare Advantage (MA), Medicare’s managed care program, is quickly expanding, yet little is known about diabetes care quality delivered under MA compared with traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old enrolled in the Diabetes Collaborative Registry from 2014 to 2019 with type 2 diabetes treated with one or more antihyperglycemic therapies. Quality measures, cardiometabolic risk factor control, and antihyperglycemic prescription patterns were compared between Medicare plan groups, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Among 345,911 Medicare beneficiaries, 229,598 (66%) were enrolled in FFS and 116,313 (34%) in MA plans (for ≥1 month). MA beneficiaries were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers for coronary artery disease, tobacco cessation counseling, and screening for retinopathy, foot care, and kidney disease (adjusted P ≤ 0.001 for all). MA beneficiaries had modestly but significantly higher systolic blood pressure (+0.2 mmHg), LDL cholesterol (+2.6 mg/dL), and HbA1c (+0.1%) (adjusted P < 0.01 for all). MA beneficiaries were independently less likely to receive glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (6.9% vs. 9.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.77–0.84) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (5.4% vs. 6.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.95). When integrating Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked data from 2014 to 2017 and more recent unlinked data from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry through 2019 (total N = 411,465), these therapeutic differences persisted, including among subgroups with established cardiovascular and kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS While MA plans enable greater access to preventive care, this may not translate to improved intermediate health outcomes. MA beneficiaries are also less likely to receive newer antihyperglycemic therapies with proven outcome benefits in high-risk individuals. Long-term health outcomes under various Medicare plans requires surveillance.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Hasche J , WardC, SchlutermanN. Diabetes Occurrence, Costs, and Access to Care among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years and Over. In Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Office of Enterprise Data & Analytics, 2017. Accessed 1 April 2021. Available from https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/MCBS/Downloads/Diabetes_DataBrief_2017.pdf

2. Cost-related insulin underuse among patients with diabetes;Herkert;JAMA Intern Med,2019

3. Factors contributing to the rising national cost of glucose-lowering medicines for diabetes during 2005-2007 and 2015-2017;Zhou;Diabetes Care,2020

4. Freed M , DamicoA, NeumanT. A Dozen Facts about Medicare Advantage in 2020. Kaiser Family Foundation; 13 January 2021. Accessed 1 April 2021. Available from https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/a-dozen-facts-about-medicare-advantage-in-2020/

5. Differences in management of coronary artery disease in patients with Medicare Advantage vs traditional fee-for-service Medicare among cardiology practices;Figueroa;JAMA Cardiol,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3