Microvascular Complications at Time of Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Are Similar Among Diabetic Patients Detected by Targeted Screening and Patients Newly Diagnosed in General Practice

Author:

Spijkerman Annemieke M.W.1,Dekker Jacqueline M.1,Nijpels Giel1,Adriaanse Marcel C.1,Kostense Piet J.12,Ruwaard Dirk3,Stehouwer Coen D.A.14,Bouter Lex M.1,Heine Robert J.15

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. Public Health Division, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. Department of Endocrinology, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To investigate whether screening-detected diabetic patients differ from diabetic patients newly diagnosed in general practice with regard to the presence of microvascular complications. RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS—Diabetic patients, identified by a population-based targeted screening procedure consisting of a screening questionnaire and a fasting capillary whole-blood glucose measurement followed by diagnostic testing, were compared with patients newly diagnosed with diabetes in general practice. Retinopathy was assessed with fundus photography, impaired foot sensitivity was assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, and the presence of microalbuminuria was measured by means of the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). RESULTS—A total of 195 screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 60 patients newly diagnosed in general practice participated in the medical examination. The prevalence of retinopathy was higher in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients than in patients newly diagnosed in general practice, but not significantly higher. The prevalence of retinopathy was 7.6% (95% CI 4.6–12.4) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 1.9% (0.3–9.8) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The prevalence of impaired foot sensitivity was similar in both groups, 48.1% (40.9–55.3) and 48.3% (36.2–60.7), respectively. The ACR was 0.61 (interquartile range 0.41–1.50) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 0.99 (0.53–2.49) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The difference in prevalence of microalbuminuria was not statistically significant. The prevalence of microalbuminuria was 17.2% (95% CI 12.5–23.2) and 26.7% (17.1–39.0) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and patients newly diagnosed in general practice, respectively. CONCLUSIONS—Targeted screening for type 2 diabetes (with a screening questionnaire as a first step) resulted in the identification of previously undiagnosed diabetic patients with a considerable prevalence of microvascular complications.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 176 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3